<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photosynth Could Spark Virtual Earth Comeback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback</link>
	<description>Internet, Web 2.0 and Real Estate Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:02:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Barone</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-27270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Barone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/?p=1606#comment-27270</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t like Photosynth when I tried it. I think they still have a lot of work to do if they want their products to catch on. It was a pain just to get everything installed to where I could actually view the photosynth website, I believe they required you to download their software bundle which contained not one, but TWO programs...
MS products seem too bulky and bloated for the average person. I have an excellent computer setup going which has never crashed once on me in like a year, then I installed Virtual Earth and it crashes....

Google is way ahead of MS. Better APIs, better integration, easier to use, better UI, lower cost.

I&#039;m willing to bet there&#039;s a ton of companies out there that only use Virtual Earth because of their &quot;bird&#039;s eye&quot; view pictures. When Google gets this, it&#039;s going to be game over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t like Photosynth when I tried it. I think they still have a lot of work to do if they want their products to catch on. It was a pain just to get everything installed to where I could actually view the photosynth website, I believe they required you to download their software bundle which contained not one, but TWO programs&#8230;<br />
MS products seem too bulky and bloated for the average person. I have an excellent computer setup going which has never crashed once on me in like a year, then I installed Virtual Earth and it crashes&#8230;.</p>
<p>Google is way ahead of MS. Better APIs, better integration, easier to use, better UI, lower cost.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m willing to bet there&#8217;s a ton of companies out there that only use Virtual Earth because of their &#8220;bird&#8217;s eye&#8221; view pictures. When Google gets this, it&#8217;s going to be game over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-27244</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/?p=1606#comment-27244</guid>
		<description>I agree with the first few comments.  As a developer of online search tools my primary concern is cost, and Google has Microsoft beat.

I think it&#039;s a very slick app, but Microsoft offers an API similar to Google I&#039;ll probably never use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the first few comments.  As a developer of online search tools my primary concern is cost, and Google has Microsoft beat.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a very slick app, but Microsoft offers an API similar to Google I&#8217;ll probably never use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laguna Niguel Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-27224</link>
		<dc:creator>Laguna Niguel Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/?p=1606#comment-27224</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used this software. With a user-friendly visual aspect and the coolest thing is that a bottom-right icon allows you to have a synth occupy your entire browser window. Also, you can improve the view further by putting your browser into full-screen mode with your F11 function key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used this software. With a user-friendly visual aspect and the coolest thing is that a bottom-right icon allows you to have a synth occupy your entire browser window. Also, you can improve the view further by putting your browser into full-screen mode with your F11 function key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kori Covrigaru</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-27222</link>
		<dc:creator>Kori Covrigaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/?p=1606#comment-27222</guid>
		<description>VE doesn&#039;t have a flash API. This is our biggest barrier when considering VE vs. Google or Yahoo! Hopefully this changes soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VE doesn&#8217;t have a flash API. This is our biggest barrier when considering VE vs. Google or Yahoo! Hopefully this changes soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-27221</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/?p=1606#comment-27221</guid>
		<description>yeah right now companies are going to want to efficiency and cost cutting. This new type of imaging is going to be amazing though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah right now companies are going to want to efficiency and cost cutting. This new type of imaging is going to be amazing though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galen</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/photosynth-could-spark-virtual-earth-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-27216</link>
		<dc:creator>Galen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/?p=1606#comment-27216</guid>
		<description>Google maps are as good or better technically and the price difference between Google Maps and Microsoft is just too great.

The dumb money - the money tied up in board meetings and memo-driven decision making uses Microsoft Maps. The smart money scrimps where it can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google maps are as good or better technically and the price difference between Google Maps and Microsoft is just too great.</p>
<p>The dumb money &#8211; the money tied up in board meetings and memo-driven decision making uses Microsoft Maps. The smart money scrimps where it can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
