Estately Comes to Portland
Estately.com has long been one of my favorite real estate search experiences on the web (see 10 Kick Ass Real Estate Search Sites). And today it just got much better (well, for me at least, anyway).
This morning they announced that they have expanded in to Oregon by adding over 35,000+ Portland single family homes and condos into their search results. Listings are being pulled from the RMLS™ Regional Multiple Listing Service.
A couple of things really set Estately apart from the competition and certainly any of the local broker sites. First, the neighborhood search tool is fantastic. Say you want to do a search for a home in one of Portland’s hot neighborhoods; Mississippi, Sellwood or the Pearl, for example. Estately plots the neighborhood boundaries on to its map and confines the search to those boundaries – making it really easy to streamline your search.
(One weird bug I found was that when I did a search in my neighborhood it kept telling me I lived in North Bend – Estately founder Galen Ward confirmed this was a known issue and that they were working hard to fix it).
The second new feature in Estately, and one I think Rose City residents are going to love, is a revamped ability to confine your search results their proximity to mass transit routes like the MAX Light Rail Service.
An example search:
I suspect this type of information, along with services like WalkScore (see Measuring Walkability with Walk Score), are increasingly going to be factors that people build in to their home searches (especially as more and more stare down $4+ gas)
Brokers, I’d follow Estately’s lead and start building this type of functionality into your web sites. It’s could be a great point of differentiation in your marketing vis a vis your local competition.
Portland-based Realtors, Estately offers you a way to connect with and offer your services to local home buyers and sellers through its Agent Match program. Estately screens and vets all Realtors in the program to ensure an excellent level of service but if you’re looking to Connect with tech-savvy and tech-sophicasted buyers – this may be an excellent way to do so.
The downside to the new site is that — apparently due to the RMLS rules — Estately is not able to display the addresses of the properties displayed on the map. Apparently, according to Ward, they are able to share those via email – so the site will heavily encourage you to send those listings you’re interested in either to yourself or a partner in order to see the street address. A kludgey workaround but forced on them by the arcane rules of the local MLS.
9 Comment(s)
3 Trackback(s)
- From Matt Goyer’s Real Estate Blog » Blog Archive » Estately Heads South Without Addresses | May 28, 2008
- From Silly MLS IDX Rules | GeekEstate Blog | May 29, 2008
- From Estately, DOJ, and other weirdness | 1000Watt Consulting | Mar 24, 2009
JoshuaFerris | May 27, 2008 | Reply
It's coming along nicely, great work Galen and Estately!
Dan | May 28, 2008 | Reply
It seems to be more and more common for sites to focus in on a relatively small geographical area (eg estately, roost, redfin, etc.) and work it well.
It seems eventually one, or maybe more, of these guys will emerge and challenge the searches with the big national focus.
Graeme K. Brown | May 28, 2008 | Reply
I love the functionality of the website. The proximity to local transportation is a huge asset. The MLS restrictions are frustrating for a number of reasons, but one is the inability to utilize other marketing tools such as guided home tours for listed homes. Many MLS's have restricitons on the content used to market a home which ultimately could harm the ability of that home to sell.
Hawaii_Real_Estate | May 29, 2008 | Reply
I saw this yesterday. Great job Estately, I'm jealous. I did notice that when you typed in Portland, it gave me multiple choices and when I selected a Portland outside of the RMLS, like in Texas, it was able to map it and put boundaries on it even though there were no properties.
Hmmm…could they be going nation wide?
Jonathan Cardella | May 30, 2008 | Reply
The guys at Estately do a great job with very little backing. When you compare that to the big guys like Zillow and Trulia, it really puts it into perspective. I am sure they want to go national but the fact that they are mapping neighborhoods nationally is not an indication because their neighborhood definitions are already on a national level while their property listings are added one MLS at a time. Unfortunately “going national” is a slow and painstaking process and don't be fooled, this is by design.
What I find interesting is the RMLS regulations which require Estately not to display property addresses. This is preposterous and definitely not in the spirit of the recent DOJ settlement with NAR. While that settlement applied only to VOW Agreements, in theory, what the DOJ finds acceptable is that online brokers (with membership) and their off line counterparts must be able to provide the same information to consumers (that the MLS normally provides its members). Essentially, this MLS regulation is designed to make Estately and similarly innovative businesses less competitive than local brick and mortar brokers, thereby limiting Estately's reach and ability to provide consumers with better agents at lower commission rates. Locking out companies like Estately is definitely not in the best interest of the consumer or the industry. And at a time when when our national real estate market is experiencing a major downturn, any efforts to stifle competition and exposure to the sector should be viewed as high treason, IMHO.
Galen Ward | May 30, 2008 | Reply
Jonathan, we are very disappointed by our inability to show addresses for RMLS properties. I do believe it stifles competition and limits our ability to serve consumers. We are working with RMLS board members to change this situation. Good call.
Galen Ward | May 30, 2008 | Reply
Jonathan, we are very disappointed by our inability to show addresses for RMLS properties. I do believe it stifles competition and limits our ability to serve consumers. We are working with RMLS board members to change this situation. Good call.
sohoprop | May 31, 2008 | Reply
Looks like a great site
Jon Baker | Jun 3, 2008 | Reply
It's interesting looking at the differences between multi listing sites in the US and the UK. Obviously geography plays a big part in driving some of the differences, but I think there's a lot to learn in both directions. Take a look at globrix.co.uk for instance as a new UK site (that I have no connection with other than as a user).