<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Move.com Tried to Buy ActiveRain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sai sais</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-95739</link>
		<dc:creator>sai sais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-95739</guid>
		<description>THE POST IS REALLY GOOD . I APPRECIATE IT. KEEP SHARING SUCH STUFF WITH US.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE POST IS REALLY GOOD . I APPRECIATE IT. KEEP SHARING SUCH STUFF WITH US&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Jansen</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-57331</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 03:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-57331</guid>
		<description>Just found this article. I agree that AR could be duplicated with the right equipment. I think the trick would be to get the roughly 193,000 folks to write and contribute to another site. Real estate agents seem to be overwhelmed with so many place to contribute to. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found this article. I agree that AR could be duplicated with the right equipment. I think the trick would be to get the roughly 193,000 folks to write and contribute to another site. Real estate agents seem to be overwhelmed with so many place to contribute to. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Sperber</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4252</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Sperber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4252</guid>
		<description>WOW...thats insane that ActiveRain.com is worth that much!  Just goes to show you the power of social networking because there is no way the current advertising model on AR is producing that much revenue!  Whats the multiple....200?

I have a few ActiveRain.com accounts and I hope the SEO value of the community is not limited if a sale ever does go through.

Cody Sperber
Real Estate SEO Training Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW&#8230;thats insane that ActiveRain.com is worth that much!  Just goes to show you the power of social networking because there is no way the current advertising model on AR is producing that much revenue!  Whats the multiple&#8230;.200?</p>
<p>I have a few ActiveRain.com accounts and I hope the SEO value of the community is not limited if a sale ever does go through.</p>
<p>Cody Sperber<br />
Real Estate SEO Training Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate Living</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4251</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate Living</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4251</guid>
		<description>The key issue or wake up call for real estate agents is “Don’t be fooled, your content is very valuable.”

And I just agree with that line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key issue or wake up call for real estate agents is “Don’t be fooled, your content is very valuable.”</p>
<p>And I just agree with that line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billie Hillier</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4250</link>
		<dc:creator>Billie Hillier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4250</guid>
		<description>I just stumbled on this looking through the archives. Does anyone know what the end result was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just stumbled on this looking through the archives. Does anyone know what the end result was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Actually ActiveRain &#38; Trulia both REALLY suck... — Web Real Estate Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4249</link>
		<dc:creator>Actually ActiveRain &#38; Trulia both REALLY suck... — Web Real Estate Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4249</guid>
		<description>[...] to sell their platform but in fact this plan was foiled as Move.com (the operators of Realtor.com) backed out of the deal at the last minute. After the deal went sour and within weeks their free offering suddenly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to sell their platform but in fact this plan was foiled as Move.com (the operators of Realtor.com) backed out of the deal at the last minute. After the deal went sour and within weeks their free offering suddenly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laguna Niguel Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4248</link>
		<dc:creator>Laguna Niguel Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4248</guid>
		<description>That&#039;d be a cool deal! I personally this Active Rain&#039;s worth more than $30 million, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;d be a cool deal! I personally this Active Rain&#8217;s worth more than $30 million, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sosnowski</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4247</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sosnowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4247</guid>
		<description>I have always been a believer in hosting our own content on blog and website. I also don&#039;t believe consumers flock to networks like AR.  They, instead, do searches online for locations that interest them.  Good blogs and website will be found - and you can compete with the giants.  The only real purpose was for someone to make money from AR - in like all real estate portals, it was eventually going to be on the backs of realtors.  What a surprise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been a believer in hosting our own content on blog and website. I also don&#8217;t believe consumers flock to networks like AR.  They, instead, do searches online for locations that interest them.  Good blogs and website will be found &#8211; and you can compete with the giants.  The only real purpose was for someone to make money from AR &#8211; in like all real estate portals, it was eventually going to be on the backs of realtors.  What a surprise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overland Park Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4246</link>
		<dc:creator>Overland Park Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4246</guid>
		<description>Its been 7 months or so now, any updates?  This really makes Move look bad IMO.  Does&#039;nt do much for AR either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its been 7 months or so now, any updates?  This really makes Move look bad IMO.  Does&#8217;nt do much for AR either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m fascinated by HouseValues investment&#8230; &#171; 4realz.net</title>
		<link>http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/2007/09/27/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain/comment-page-1/#comment-4245</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m fascinated by HouseValues investment&#8230; &#171; 4realz.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futureofrealestatemarketing.com/movecom-tried-to-buy-activerain#comment-4245</guid>
		<description>[...] 21, 2008 by Dustin    and while I&#8217;ll refrain from having an opinion for fear of lawyers (yes&#8230; I am lawyer-phobia even if some say this condition doesn&#8217;t exist), I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 21, 2008 by Dustin    and while I&#8217;ll refrain from having an opinion for fear of lawyers (yes&#8230; I am lawyer-phobia even if some say this condition doesn&#8217;t exist), I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

